时间:2025-04-21 16:39:18 来源:网络整理编辑:cs cases
Janel Grant Seeks Discovery In Lawsuit Against Vince McMahonJanel Grant has filed an amended lawsuit
Janel Grant has filed an amended lawsuit against Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and WWE, which includes allegations of sexual assault and sex trafficking during her time as a WWE employee. The updated filing expands on claims that McMahon sexually exploited her, Laurinaitis became complicit, and WWE was aware of the misconduct. The amended complaint can be read here.
In a significant procedural move, Grant’s legal team has filed a motion requesting that the court initiate the discovery phase—a process in which both parties must exchange relevant documents and evidence. The defense, however, is opposing this motion, arguing that the lawsuit should be moved to private arbitration, not litigated in open court, citing a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) signed by Grant that includes an arbitration clause.
The matter now rests with Judge Sarah F. Russell, who must decide whether discovery can begin before ruling on the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. Her decision will determine whether the case proceeds in public court or is handled privately under arbitration rules.
According to a report from Brandon Thurston of POST Wrestling, the plaintiffs’ request for discovery includes a broad range of documents and personnel records:
“The filings state the plaintiffs’ request for documents ‘may include any subsidiary and/or current or former executive, employee, contractor, agent, and/or similarly situated personnel of WWE, TKO, and/or Endeavor Group Holdings.’”
Grant’s attorneys are specifically seeking:
Records of McMahon’s payments to other women
WWE’s policies related to sexual harassment
Travel records for McMahon, Laurinaitis, and Brock Lesnar
As part of her trafficking claims, Grant alleges she was sexually assaulted by both McMahon and Laurinaitis and that sexual encounters involving her were offered to Brock Lesnar during his WWE contract renegotiations—an explosive allegation that has drawn significant attention.
In response, WWE and its co-defendants argue that launching discovery now would be premature, potentially wasting resources if the case is ultimately shifted to arbitration. In an email included as an exhibit in the latest court filings, a Paul Weiss attorney representing WWE asserted that local federal court rules in Connecticut permit discovery to be postponed until a ruling is made on the arbitration request.
The case continues to unfold, with the court’s upcoming decision on the sequence of proceedings poised to significantly impact how the high-profile legal battle plays out—either in public court or behind closed doors.
Confirmed For Next Week’s Episode Of WWE RAW On Netflix2025-04-21 16:38
MSL wins DreamHack Masters Stockholm MVP award2025-04-21 16:29
IEM Sydney Asia closed qualifier set to kick off2025-04-21 16:25
apEX: "It feels like we have pressure on ourselves because it's a Major"2025-04-21 15:55
Jeff Cobb Sparks WWE Speculation After Questioning NJPW Future2025-04-21 15:18
Liquid to EPICENTER Wild Card Qualifier2025-04-21 15:02
ECS S6 Finals viewer's guide2025-04-21 14:45
Video: ZywOo vs. FURIA2025-04-21 14:33
Monopoly Go: Airplane Mode Dice Trick2025-04-21 14:33
eNergy sweep Bravado; win ESL African Championship2025-04-21 14:11
Jey Uso Shares What He Learned From Being In The Ring With John Cena2025-04-21 16:38
Intel Challenge Katowice 2018: Everything you need to know2025-04-21 16:26
Na`Vi edge past FaZe to reach StarSeries final2025-04-21 15:56
Spirit pull out of EPICENTER qualifier2025-04-21 15:33
New Tiki Adventures Gleam Giveaway2025-04-21 15:18
Astralis breeze past Virtus.pro at BLAST Pro Series Istanbul2025-04-21 15:14
Intel Challenge Katowice 2018: Everything you need to know2025-04-21 14:55
Tainted Minds finalize ESL Pro League Season 7 APAC Finals team list2025-04-21 14:40
Boy Meets World Cast Heading To WWE WrestleMania 412025-04-21 14:36
NA closed qualifier for Americas Minor set to start2025-04-21 13:58